UCA Update: Where is Lincoln when you need them?
We're coming to you with an update on how our signature concept, UCA is proceeding.
We're not getting any traction yet. We haven't had any viewers per se and we don't have any real followers. We thought this might be the time to abandon the idea and then we caught a glimpse of Marco Rubio, cheering his campaign on after coming in third. Claiming victory after winning Minnesota. His speeches after failing were an inspiration.
So we return. We're confident that once Mr. Drumpf (see: John Oliver) gets word of the UCA plan to divide the country he'll begin to wield it.
Currently there are new issues on the horizon that make clear the truth that few people are willing to discuss: The American people do not agree.
We are not an agreeable country and the truth is we haven't ever really and truly agreed for any very long periods of time. As you study American history you see that whatever agreements have been made and used as a fulcrum for change have frequently been seen in hindsight with regret. The system is fundamentally broken because people who live in the society have resigned themselves to eternal war and nowhere is this more fundamentally clear than on the issue of abortion. Some history is valuable:
Abortions have been taking place for as long as human beings have been afraid of having children for various reasons. No religious position of movement has ever successfully stopped all women from having abortions in the history of human beings.
I am always trying to understand what the other side is really proposing.
Near as I can tell the Republican right has not started a movement against procreation or sexual intercourse, although that's debatable.
Near as I can tell from the current Republican Party, in their view in the future UCA, pregnancies will not come from unwanted sexual intercourse and pregnancies that do come from desired intercourse will result in growing families and there will be jobs and circumstances for the individuals responsible for the sex. Sex is good. Sex only happens in marriage. It's purpose is joy and procreation and any deviation from that will have consequences.
We're proposing a new system where ONLY women of child bearing age have a vote on abortion laws.
But on the day of this last Republican debate the question burning in my mind for candidates to respond to is how do you intend to reach out to those who don't agree with you? How do you propose we build bridges between these different constituencies.
We think someone should propose the UCA to one of the cnadidates and see how they react. See if someone can say something Abraham Lincoln like right now . Because we really need somone like Abraham Lincoln right now and it doesn't look like they're around.
We're not getting any traction yet. We haven't had any viewers per se and we don't have any real followers. We thought this might be the time to abandon the idea and then we caught a glimpse of Marco Rubio, cheering his campaign on after coming in third. Claiming victory after winning Minnesota. His speeches after failing were an inspiration.
So we return. We're confident that once Mr. Drumpf (see: John Oliver) gets word of the UCA plan to divide the country he'll begin to wield it.
Currently there are new issues on the horizon that make clear the truth that few people are willing to discuss: The American people do not agree.
We are not an agreeable country and the truth is we haven't ever really and truly agreed for any very long periods of time. As you study American history you see that whatever agreements have been made and used as a fulcrum for change have frequently been seen in hindsight with regret. The system is fundamentally broken because people who live in the society have resigned themselves to eternal war and nowhere is this more fundamentally clear than on the issue of abortion. Some history is valuable:
Abortions have been taking place for as long as human beings have been afraid of having children for various reasons. No religious position of movement has ever successfully stopped all women from having abortions in the history of human beings.
I am always trying to understand what the other side is really proposing.
Near as I can tell the Republican right has not started a movement against procreation or sexual intercourse, although that's debatable.
Near as I can tell from the current Republican Party, in their view in the future UCA, pregnancies will not come from unwanted sexual intercourse and pregnancies that do come from desired intercourse will result in growing families and there will be jobs and circumstances for the individuals responsible for the sex. Sex is good. Sex only happens in marriage. It's purpose is joy and procreation and any deviation from that will have consequences.
We're proposing a new system where ONLY women of child bearing age have a vote on abortion laws.
But on the day of this last Republican debate the question burning in my mind for candidates to respond to is how do you intend to reach out to those who don't agree with you? How do you propose we build bridges between these different constituencies.
We think someone should propose the UCA to one of the cnadidates and see how they react. See if someone can say something Abraham Lincoln like right now . Because we really need somone like Abraham Lincoln right now and it doesn't look like they're around.